Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Why Must Male Egos Control Every Aspect of Women’s Lives?
A lesbian is a woman. A woman is a lesbian. Why are the two constantly defined as being dichotomous? The only distinction is their sexual preference. The RADICALESBIANS point out that both are met with oppression and limitations of their most basic roles in society. Both terms are socially constructed by males to ensure that the sexist undertones of American society persist. These sex roles function to dehumanize women by merely assigning labels to their social existence. Lesbians encounter much of the same problems as heterosexual women, yet, their efforts to combat the oppression that they face is most often done solitarily. Why must their be this divide? The time is now. We, as women, can no longer allow men to structure our livelihood and daily operation in society. It is this notion of patriarchy in society that creates a divide between women. I would actually go so far as to call it a “double consciousness,” in that lesbian women are in the midst of an internal battle between their identity as a woman and a lesbian. This internal battle manifest itself in the form a “scripted reality” that is representational of a male dominated stance. Thus, the internal essence of the woman is lost in translation, and is rather suited to satisfy the egos of patriarchal forces. Scripted reality, in a sense, that it could be looked at as the fantasies or dreams of the dominate. All this is, is a manifestation of the gender border control that formulates an individual’s gender identity. Judith Butler also attests to the fact that gender is used in way to establish and maintain specific codes of cultural coherence for the purposes of social regulation and control. As a result, there is a construction of the gendered body though a series of exclusions and denials based on the dichotomous nature of human existence. It is these prohibitions that produce identity that is based on an idealized an compulsory heterosexuality. If this is the case, where do lesbians fit in the picture? Their identity becomes categorized as “other” or “deviant” and challenges set codes of femininity and/or female existence. The assigning of labels is central to the maintaing of power.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I agree with you in that lesbians do face a type of double-consciousness however, I am struggling with the use of the term. Historically double-consciousness has been used to characterize the struggle of Black Americans with being an American and of African descent. For lesbians, the struggle is between being a woman and being a lesbian. My tension rises from the idea there has to be no distinction between the two as you state in your post yet Black Americans faced the merging of two different cultures. So, while I do see the internal struggle lesbians face, my question is whether it is a double-consciousness or rather a tension within one consciousness as a result society's rigid gender ideas.
I totally agree that lesbians face a double-consciousness, I'm sure that some of these women feel they often have to choose between being a woman and relating to her hetrosexual sisters just to be told that she cannot understand their situations. Also I wonder what is the opinion of transgendered females who feel that they are in the "wrong" body and choose to be female, can we consider them women and invite them to struggle us in this feminist movement?
Last week I was in Wal-mart and this ugly dude tried to talk to me so I grabbed my friends arm and said "Um, can you please respect the fact that I am spending the day with my lover." and he said "Oh, you're gay?" and I responded "Yes" and he said "So that means that I can get with both of ya'll." I am appalled with the disrespectful attitude that men have developed toward lesbianism. I acknowledge that sometimes it seems like being gay is becoming a fad, as it is easy to spot two "strait" girls making out in a club, but it seems as if men do not respect lesbianism as real lifestyle. It is almost as if the think that a woman is gay to appear more desirable to men or to provide men with more sexual experiences. I definitely emphasize with the lesbian community, as most Americans don't even respect lesbianism as a real sexual identification that effects ones whole lifestyle. Damn those strait girls making out in the Velvet Room!
good questions. Naming and renaming can be tools that challenge the power embedded in labeling. In the late 60's and 70's many feminists adopted the name "lesbian" regardless of their sexual practices as a symbol of solidarity and political ideology.
I think that labeling is one of the biggest problems. In fact, I believe that it is counterproductive for the RADICALESBIANS to use the term "lesbians" in their name and at the same time condemn it. While using it in their name may serve as a form of resistance, but more people will see the word "lesbian" and probably already have a set of social and cultural ideas linked to it. Why don't they start by deviating from this process of labeling. Its not like they haven't stepped out of the box already.
Post a Comment